|
The photos and videos are separated into two different areas so you can view either one
or the other (but there are no links between the two, strangely). They also seem pretty much aligned with
around 20 of the 200 videos without a corresponding photo set.
Clicking on the latest movie updates page shows the latest 30 sets and you can click through
to the older movies from here too. The photos are set out in the same way but they don’t appear to be
stills from the movie, or even taken at the same time – it seems that the pics are taken around the same
time, perhaps just after the movie has been filmed. That means that you don’t get any annoying flashes
from still cameras during the videos.
There are also some additional bits that aren’t featured in the videos so they do hold their
own appeal and are worth checking out. For example, in Shay’s first photo set she has another, older woman
come in and stand topless with her, kissing her in one shot. No real idea who she was but it was a rather
nice surprise.
You can see all of the photo thumbnails on one page and if you click on one it opens a new
tab in your browser with your chosen pic. From here you have the option to scroll through the next and
previous shots or close the tab altogether and return to the thumbnail page.
The photos, like the movies, are all high quality and are usually 1200 x 806 pixels so you
can easily see every inch of the action. However, this screen size means that you’ll not be able to see
the whole pic at the same time unless you have a higher than usual screen resolution.
Again, like the movies, the photos have an ‘out of ten’ rating of the girl provided by Jim
himself. However, these don’t really mean a lot because apart from 5 or so girls, they’re all rated 7
and above. One poor girl right at the end of the site (back in 2003) is rated a 4. Obviously, when you
get something as stand-out as that, I had to check her out to see what was so bad about her. To be honest,
I couldn’t tell you; I didn’t think she was much different from most of the others on the site. Beauty
is in the eye of the beholder I guess – I can only imagine that he’s had a bad experience with her.
On to the movies then and you can see a single thumbnail of the girl (or girls) in question
along with the date it was uploaded (and the rating again).
The movie is split into a number of parts (typically 5 but sometimes more) and each section
has its own thumbnail and the ability to download just that chapter. You also have 3 options for how high
the resolution should be; low, high and full.
For those on slower connections, the low quality movie is fine and, at 320 x 340 pixels,
you can double the size of the movie playback without losing a huge amount of picture quality. The downloads
themselves are pretty quick but I wouldn’t bother trying to do more than one movie at the same time –
it does appear possible (sometimes) but for me, certainly, the rest of the site seemed to slow to a stop
until one finished.
In terms of the content, it’s fairly similar really. Again, the premise is that he meets
these girls on the street and offers them money to fuck him, so you’re not likely to see some of the more
extreme ‘niches’ that some other sites offer. What Jim Slip offers is straight forward fucking – in the
ass, in the pussy and, of course, a fair splattering of oral too.
I do have one concern, though, and it’s a fairy big one in relation to the whole point
of the site.
You see Jim’s dick. A lot. The thing is, the only thing you ever see wrapped around Jim’s
cock is a girl – there are no condoms used at all.
Now I don’t know about you, but if I was a woman and someone said ‘here’s £500 for you
to fuck me’ I’d be quite offended. Even if I was quite excited about it and wanted to earn the money,
I’d be hugely concerned that the resulting fuck was going to be videoed, photographed and put on a website
for people to see for the rest of eternity.
Now, let’s say that I was a complete exhibitionist and happy to have my bits shown around
the world, if someone said ‘no condoms’, I can’t conceive of anyone but the truly destitute who would
say yes.
Therein lies the annoying bit. The whole theme of the site, I believe, is a sham. I don’t
believe for a second that these girls aren’t paid porn stars – they are just acting as if they’re Jane
Doe (to coin an American term) straight off the street. This is backed up by the fact that internationally
renowned porn star Ashley Long is one of his early conquests.
If, like me, you don’t believe the theme then it becomes just another porn site where one
guy fucks lots of girls.
And, so I guess that forms the basis of the recommendation. If you can see past the fact
that it’s almost certainly porn actresses trying to live up to the second half of their title then it’s
a decent site, updated on a weekly basis with exclusive content then it’s a good site. Conversely, if
you are looking for real amateurs shagging for the first time in front of professional setups with a seasoned
male porn star then you will be disappointed. Check
it out for yourself here.
reviewed April 2009
|
